I read every brief personally. If your problem is a fit, you'll hear back directly, not from an SDR, within two business days.
Two engagements at a time. Fit is the only filter, a real problem, a decision-maker in the room, and a twelve-month horizon that is reachable. Briefs get declined often, and quickly.
Most engagements begin by clarifying the problem, the operating gaps, and the decision that needs to be made. From there, I recommend the right service or next step. Every engagement ends with a practical deliverable the business can use, not a strategy deck.
Probably. Most businesses using AI tools are using them on top of an operating layer that was never designed to support them. That creates inconsistent outputs, unmanaged risk, and staff using tools without clear rules. The tools themselves are not the problem, the operating foundations underneath usually are. If your data is unreliable, your processes are informal, or your knowledge is scattered, adding more tools will not fix that.
Based in Melbourne, with a preference for in-person work at least monthly. Currently engaging with businesses across Australia.
That is probably because most businesses do not have an AI problem. They have an operating system problem. Messy processes, unreliable data, scattered knowledge, and unclear ownership. If that sounds familiar, it is exactly what I work on. AI readiness starts with fixing the operating layer underneath, not adding tools on top.
I read every brief personally and store them encrypted. They are never used to train models. They are never shared with prospective collaborators without written consent. If an NDA is needed up front, ask.